RPA/AI/ML Service Provider - To Be Or Not To Be
As with the global organisations, IT services companies too are exploring various offerings in Robotics Process Automation, Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning and if these services make sense for company's positioning, growth and profitability. Various financial, operating, human resource, governance models are being experimented by and within companies.
Most popular service offerings in these areas are:
1. Professional Services - Consulting (Automation Potential
Assessment, Building Road-map, Tool Selection, Cost Benefit Analysis,
Center of Excellency Setup Services, Audit services)
2. Professional Services - Training
3. Professional Services - Implementation (Design, Build, Run and
Maintenance)
4. License Resell Services
It has been observed that consulting based assignments
tend to more profitable than implementation and resell services.
IT companies don't qualify their offerings on
"profitability" alone but also on "comparative
profitability". Then there are other factors like sustainability, human
capital availability, geographical diversification, investment appetite etc.
Compared to traditional business of IT services companies like
application development and maintenance, infrastructure, business process
outsourcing, RPA and AI/ML services lack longevity and scale as most
of the enterprises are in exploratory mode. Let’s take an example of RPA services.
An analyst firm surveyed more than 150 process improvement executives/
professionals in July 2017 to understand their key challenges, priorities and
strategies for the coming year. Annual spend on RPA (inclusive
of capital and operating cost) was less than £ 50K for 44% of respondents,
between £ 50K - £ 500K for 41% of respondents and above £ 500K for 15% of
respondents. Only 9% respondent spent above 6% £ 1m. These numbers are
minuscule compared to traditional IT services. Building an overarching layer of
robotics over existing platforms or building new age digital platforms is
always a debate before approving lump-sum investment for RPA services.
Things are not very different for other services like machine learning,
digitization and chatbots. There is always a possibility of process
re-engineering and improving data interfaces with an objective to transform
input data from unstructured to structured and further processing can be done
by digital or robotic platforms.
Should IT companies venture in these services?
It makes a lot of sense for entities with diversified
services to stand out basis these next generation
technologies. It's not uncommon for companies to use
Robotics or Machine learning as a lever to transform their existing
businesses, often cannibalizing their revenue. Bid Management teams are
increasingly integrating RPA/AI/ML with core services
and demonstrate lower total cost of ownership year on year
using these technologies. Usually top line effect of these
technologies are divided in two buckets - "Direct revenue"
and "Influenced Revenue". Let’s take example
of RPA services, Direct revenue is composite output of
consulting and build services and Influenced revenue is associated dollar
value of opportunities created by these services. Usually ratio of direct
to influenced revenue is 1:4 or lower. IT companies working in
focused areas like Application build services using latest
tool-stack e.g. upgrade of legacy systems have no incentive
to operate in RPA/AI/ML space.
Comments
Post a Comment